<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Marriage on Forgeover</title>
    <link>https://forgeover.com/tags/marriage/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Marriage on Forgeover</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2020 23:58:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://forgeover.com/tags/marriage/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Parents Have HOT SEX Too</title>
      <link>https://forgeover.com/articles/social/parents-have-hot-sex-too/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 23:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forgeover.com/articles/social/parents-have-hot-sex-too/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h2 id=&#34;mom-you-might-want-to-give-this-one-a-skip&#34;&gt;Mom, you might want to give this one a skip…&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/10/opinion/sunday/10sex.html?_r=1&#34;&gt;Erica Jong&lt;/a&gt; does not speak for us. She doesn&amp;rsquo;t speak for many of the families I know, and those parents that she does speak of may want to distance themselves from her vitriolic rhetoric. That said, this post is not a critique (per se) of her &amp;ldquo;Is Sex Passé&amp;rdquo; article. What I hope it will be is a wake-up call to our generation. Erica Jong was reflecting a secretly but widely held belief that many of my peers either struggle against, or become oppressed by; that sex after marriage, and more specifically sex after kids, is bound to be less steamy, less intense, less fulfilling, and less adventurous.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Relationship Paradox</title>
      <link>https://forgeover.com/articles/family/the-relationship-paradox/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 20:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forgeover.com/articles/family/the-relationship-paradox/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Amanda (of &lt;a href=&#34;http://sailingbritannia.blogspot.com/&#34;&gt;Britannia&lt;/a&gt;) came over last night and we got on the topic of love. Specifically &amp;ldquo;True Love&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;Soul Mates.&amp;rdquo; I have a complicated opinion on the topic of soul mates that provided good fodder for our conversation. Too soon we noticed it was midnight and had to say goodnight to our friend. As we were falling asleep I wondered aloud*:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;rsquo;m not sure how to reconcile the seemingly antithetical views I have on what makes a relationship work. On the one hand I believe that an awesome relationship demands that both partners periodically &lt;em&gt;choose&lt;/em&gt; to remain in the relationship. On the other hand I know that it is essential to believe, with the completeness of your being, that your love is immutable. The latter, I believe, amounts to a sacred commitment to the relationship (spoken or not).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>No Better Life Than This One: Reevaluating My Primary Relationship</title>
      <link>https://forgeover.com/articles/family/no-better-life-than-this-one-reevaluating-my-primary-relationship/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 16:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forgeover.com/articles/family/no-better-life-than-this-one-reevaluating-my-primary-relationship/</guid>
      <description>Can critically evaluating your relationship lead to a happier healthier self while simultaneously improving the relationship?</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
